Research of the requirements for the organization of physical exercises for employees of a medical university
Abstract
In this article, the aim of the study was to analyze the level of interest and preferences in physical exercise among employees of a medical university. The article presents the results of a survey of 112 university employees, specialists in different fields with different work experience. The employees ' opinions were identified by conducting a questionnaire. The analysis of the obtained data was carried out in accordance with the basic rules of statistical data processing. The study made it possible to visualize the desire and readiness of the majority of respondents to exercise, the willingness to train mainly in the evening after the end of the working day, the expressed preferences for training under the guidance of a coach, the greatest desire to include the pilates system in the training complex and the preference to use an ellipsoid simulator in the case of independent physical exercises
Downloads
References
2. Бауэр В.Г. Социальная значимость физической культуры и спорта в современных условиях развития России // Теория и практика физической культуры. 2004. № 1. С. 50–56.
3. Братановский С.Н., Вулах М.Г. Административно-правовой статус граждан в сфере физической культуры и спорта // Спорт: экономика, право, управление. 2015. № 3. С. 14–19.
4. Богомолова Е.С., Шапошникова М.В., Котова Н.В., Максименко Е.О., Ковальчук С.Н., Бадеева Т.В., Ашина М.В., Меркеева Е.О., Олюшина Е.А., Киселева А.С. Оценка здоровьеформирующей деятельности в образовательных учреждениях с разной интенсивностью учебного процесса // Профилактическая медицина как научнопрактическая основа сохранения и укрепления здоровья населения. Нижний Новгород, 2019. С. 18–22.
5. Грузенкин В.И. Здоровый образ жизни — норма поведения гражданина в обществе. Национальная идея — здоровье народа (здоровье, здоровый образ жизни, физическая культура и спорт). Орел, 1998.
6. Ерофеева Т.М. Физическая культура в учебном процессе вуза // Физическая культура: воспитание, образование, тренировка. 1995. С. 27–35.
7. Махник Д.И. Правовые основы общественно-государственного взаимодействия в области физической культуры и спорта // Законодательство и экономика. 2016. № 11. С. 54–60.
8. Мельник Т.Е. Государственно-частное партнерство в области физической культуры и спорта // Журнал российского права. 2016. № 12. С. 133–141.
9. Мирахмедов Ф.Т., Абдураимова Г.О. Двигательная активность и здоровье // Молодой ученый. 2017. № 2. С. 266–269.
10. Синюшкина С.Д., Меркеева Е.О. Оценка роли стресс-факторов для организации психологической подготовки спортсменов // Ученые записки университета им. П.Ф. Лесгафта. 2020. № 11 (189). С. 644–648.
11. Adams J.A., Patel S., Lopez J.R., Sackner M.A. (2018). The Effects of passive simulated jogging on short-term heart rate variability in a heterogeneous group of human subjects. J. Sports Med., 4340925. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4340925.
12. Booth M. (2015). Assessment of Physical Activity: An International Perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71: 2: 114–120. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082794.
13. Catrine Tudor-Locke, Joel E. Williams, Jared P. Reis, Delores Pluto (2012). Utility of Pedometers for Assessing Physical Activity. Sports Medicine, 32: 795–808. DOI: 10.15407/fz61.04.098.
14. Das P., Horton R. (2012). Rethinking our approach to physical activity. Europe PMC, 380 (9838): 189–190. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61024-1.
15. Dr. Pedro C. Hallal et al. (2012). Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380 (9838): 247–257. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1.
16. Katrina L. Piercy, Richard P. Troiano, Rachel M. Ballard, Susan A. Carlson, Janet E. Fulton, Deborah A. Galuska, Stephanie M. George, Richard D. Olson (2018). The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Special Communication, 320 (19): 2020–2028. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
17. Laura Q. Rogers, Stephen J. Carter, Grant Williams, Kerry S. Courneya (2018). Physical Activity. Handbook of Cancer Survivorship, 3543048. 287–307. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3543048.
18. Louisa G. Sylvia., et al. (2014). Practical Guide to Measuring Physical Activity. RESEARCH COMMENTARY, 114 (2): 199–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.018.
19. Miles L. (2007). Physical activity and health. Nutrition Bulletin, 32: 4: 314–363. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00668.x.
20. Rod K. Dishman, Richard A. Washburn, Dale A. Schoeller. (2001). Measurement of Physical Activity. Quest, 53(3): 295–309. DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2001.10491746.
21. Tim Althoff, Rok Sosič, Jennifer L. Hicks, Abby C. King, Scott L. Delp, Jure Leskovec (2017). Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature, 547:
336–339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.009.
22. Warburton Darren E.R., Bredin Shannon S.D. (2017). Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Wolters Kluwer, 32(5): 541–556. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437
Copyright (c) 2021 Health, physical culture and sports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.
Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.
