COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF VR SIMULATORS AND TRADITIONAL METHODS IN TEACHING BASKETBALL SHOOTING TECHNIQUES
Abstract
The article compares the effectiveness of VR simulators and traditional methods in teaching basketball shooting. Traditional methods are based on repetition and facial expressions, as well as on the regulatory influence of the coach, are relevant, but have a number of disadvantages: the subjective opinion of the coach and the need to invest time and physical resources. Among other difficulties, it is worth mentioning that it is difficult to recreate the real atmosphere of intense competition in the training process. In addition, athletes constantly need to strive to improve their results.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of VR simulator training and traditional training on the accuracy of the shot and the learning rate of basketball players. To achieve this goal, this study is devoted to a comprehensive study of the educational effectiveness of both methods. In parallel, a detailed examination of the psychophysiological foundations governing the formation of motor skills is carried out. Thus, the results and this study will show that using VR simulators helps not only speed up the learning process but also meet the needs of each player.
The research was based on the theoretical principles of comparative pedagogy and a detailed study of empirical data. The results of a comprehensive analysis allowed us to conclude that the methodology under study has synergetic properties. During the development of the general curriculum, a promising trajectory for further research and development was identified. Within the framework of the proposed integrated structures, the initial stages of cognitive assimilation and detailed study of the components will be most effectively carried out in a digital environment. The subsequent integration of skills and adaptive transition to real competitive scenarios will be systematically ensured through traditional practical exercises under the pedagogical guidance of specialist trainers. A theoretical analysis and comparison of different approaches were applied. The work is based on a review of scientific articles and studies dealing with sports training, the psychology of movement training, and the practical application of VR technologies in training.
Downloads
References
Еременко В. Н. Особенности развития спорта под влиянием научно-технического прогресса и его принятие человеком / Еременко В. Н., Синько О. В., Федорова Н. П. // Азимут научных исследований: педагогика и психология. – 2019. – № 3 – С. 336–338.
Кариарти И., Виртуальная реальность и спортивные результаты: систематический обзор рандомизированных контролируемых исследований, посвященных равновесию / Кариарти И., Бонанни Р., Чифелли П. // Закон о спорте. Жизнь. – 2025–№ 7 – C. 4–9.
Леонов С. В. Особенности использования виртуальной реальности в спортивной практике / Леонов С. В., Поликанова И. С., Булаева Н. И., Клименко В. А. // Национальный психологический журнал. – 2020. – № 1 – С. 18–30.
Уздинов Р. И. Применение виртуальной реальности для тренировки вестибулярной устойчивости в спорте / Уздинов Р. И. // Биология и интегративная медицина. – 2025. – №2 – C. 462.
Чертаковцев, А. О. Использование современных технологий на тренировках по баскетболу / А. О. Чертаковцев. // Молодой ученый. – 2025. – № 23 – С. 497–500.
Щербинин В.Ф. Применение AR и VR технологий в физическом воспитании и спорте / Щербинин В.Ф. // Теория и практика современной науки. – 2022. – №22 – C. 388–391.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.
Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.
