Social and pedagogical issues of adaptive educational opportunities for students with disabilities in China
Abstract
In an era of increasing globalization and social stratification, building an inclusive education system is not only an inevitable choice for China to address today's challenges but also a key component of its national education modernization policy. Growing public demand for equal opportunities for all students (regardless of disability) underscores the importance of this issue. However, despite significant progress, systematic and comprehensive studies analyzing the current state of inclusive education in China remain scarce. This paper aims to conduct a multidimensional analysis of the current state of inclusive education in China, critically examine key issues, and examine its development trends.
The materials and methods in this paper combine various qualitative analytical methods. The study's structure includes the following parts: an analysis of key national legal documents (primarily the 14th Five-Year Plan for the Development and Improvement of Special Education); a retrospective and thematic review of relevant academic literature (including articles on inclusive education, teacher training, and the application of technology in international and Russian journals); and case studies reflecting regional experiences in various provinces and cities in China.
The study's findings reveal a multidimensional and contradictory picture. On the one hand, sustained policy support at the national level has created an institutional foundation for the development of inclusive education. On the other hand, various models are being implemented in practice: from the widely used "resource class + integration into mainstream schools" model (for students with special needs) to the adaptation of differentiated instruction in mainstream classrooms and the use of advanced artificial intelligence tools (such as speech-to-text systems) to support students with disabilities. However, deep-rooted structural problems persist. Inequalities in the distribution of financial and human resources are particularly pronounced between regions, as well as between urban and rural areas, leading to high turnover among professional teachers in small towns and rural areas. Teacher training often focuses on theory rather than practice. The digital divide exacerbates these inequalities: while digital innovations are being adopted in developed regions, many rural schools continue to suffer from infrastructural problems.
The conclusion emphasizes the need for systemic changes to achieve sustainable development of inclusive education. Key recommendations include: creating a robust, multi-tiered network of legislative and resource support, including specialized funding mechanisms; and, finally, actively developing tripartite partnerships between families, schools, and communities to overcome socio-cultural barriers and attract public support for inclusive education.
Downloads
References
2. Горбунова, Е. В. (2024). Китайский опыт интеграции цифровых технологий в инклюзивное образование. Образование и наука, 26(5), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-5-78-102
3. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
4. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev
5. de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
6. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
7. Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Policy evolution and practice of inclusive education in China: From special education to learning for all. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(8), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2052356
8. Liu, J. (2022). Teacher preparedness for inclusive education in mainland China: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103628
9. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2021). The 14th Five-Year Plan for the development and enhancement of special education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jyzt_2021n/2021_zt03/
10. Peters, S. J., & Oliver, L. A. (2009). Achieving quality and equity through inclusive education in an era of high-stakes assessment. Prospects, 39(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9126-x
11. Qi, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Exploring culturally responsive pedagogy in Chinese multicultural classrooms: A case study. Comparative Education Review, 69(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1086/723456
12. Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
13. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381173
14. van Dijk, J. A. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
15. Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2024). Building inclusive school culture in Chinese primary schools: Challenges and pathways. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09896-4
16. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.
Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.
