Criteria-evaluative competencies of sophomore students of the Faculty of Physical Education in the context of distance learning
Abstract
An assessment of the formation of general cultural and professional competencies of students of future teachers of the subject of physical education in the conditions of distance learning was carried out. A study was organized consisting in comparing the assessments of graduate qualification works of bachelors of physical education by sophomore students conducted as part of classes in the subject: "Fundamentals of scientific and methodological activities" at the Faculty of Physical Culture of Moscow State Regional University in May-June 2020, with the final assessments of the state certification commission.
It was established that the shortcomings of distance learning, according to the students surveyed, include: an increase in the volume of homework, technical problems with electronic communication, a lack of live communication with teachers and fellow students and hypodynamy. The advantages of distance learning by students included: saving time and money for moving, conducting classes in a comfortable home environment, flexibility in training planning and the ability to learn new courses.
A study of the homogeneity of a group of respondents found that according to examination estimates, students were divided into two groups (with high and low grades), and according to the attendance of classes into three groups of students: absentees who go through the lesson and attend constantly. At the same time, approximately 29% of the assessment in the exam is determined by the number of visits to classes. In the remote format, attendance significantly increased by 12% (t-criterion) from the initial to the quarantine period. It is also determined that 13% of the value of the final assessment of graduate qualification works is determined by the personality of the student expert in the sample under study, and not by the content of the applicant's report and presentation.
As a result of cluster analysis, three clusters of expert students are identified, differing in levels of responsibility, social and cognitive intelligence.
It was established that criterion-evaluation competencies in terms of assessing knowledge in the subject area of "physical culture" are formed in most students by the end of the second year. More than 80% of sophomore students begin to evaluate graduate work almost the same as members of the state certification commission
Downloads
References
2. Григорьев А.И., Бугаков А.И. Проблема здоровьесбережения в условиях современной школы / А.И. Григорьев, А.И. Бугаков // Известия Воронежского государственного педагогического университета. 2015. № 1 (266). С. 69-73.
3. Гумеров Р.А. К вопросу о новом содержании деятельности преподавателя физической культуры / Р.А. Гумеров // Современные исследования социальных проблем (электронный научный журнал). 2015. № 1. С. 159-166.
4. Коробченко А. И. Проблема организации деятельности студентов по самостоятельному формированию двигательного режима /А.И. Коробченко // Наука о человеке: гуманитарные исследования. 2020. № 1 (39). С. 100-106.
5. Кутьин И.В. и др. Формирование универсальной компетенции на занятиях физической культурой у студентов специальной медицинской группы непрофильного университета / И.В. Кутьин, Е.М. Андропова, О.В. Шиманский, Т.В. Голушко, Е.Ю. Колганова // Современное педагогическое образование. 2019. № 8. С. 57-59.
6. Набойченко Е.С. и др. Повышение профессиональной компетенции преподавателя физической культуры в процессе формирования коммуникативных навыков / Е.С. Набойченко, Г.И. Мехович, С.Д. Кунышева, Е.А. Гончарова // Актуальные проблемы психологического знания. 2016. № 3 (40). С. 117-123.
7. Стандарт основного общего образования по физической культуре [Электронный ресурс] : https://nsportal.ru/nachalnaya-shkola/fizkultura/2015/01/09/standart-osnovnogo-obshchego-obrazovaniya-po-fizicheskoy. Дата обращения: 15.07.2020.
8. Стрижак А.П., Корольков А.Н., Денисова В.М. Факторы эффективности спортивно-массовой работы в физкультурном ВУЗе / А.П. Стрижак, А.Н. Корольков, В.М. Денисова // Вестник спортивной науки. 2015, № 6, С.53-59.
9. Трушина Е.В. Коммуникативная культура как важнейшая составляющая профессиональной компетенции преподавателя физической культуры в современном вузе / Е.В. Трушина // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Физическая культура. Спорт. 2018. № 4. С. 125-130.
10. Федорова Т.Ю., Морозова Л.П. Особенности преподавания учебной дисциплины "физическая культура" в техническом университете / Т.Ю. Фёдорова, Л.П. Морозова // Мир науки. 2017. Т. 5. № 4. С. 28.
11. Kuzmenko D., Kaipov S. Factors affecting students activity in the educational process on physical culture / D. Kuzmenko, S. Kaipov // Вестник Северо-Казахстанского государственного университета имени Манаша Козыбаева. 2018. № 4 (41). С. 186-189.
References
1. Antipov A.V., Kulishenko I.V., Shustova E.V. (2020), Pedagogical control and self-control of the physical state of youth in the process of physical activity, Theory and practice of physical culture, No. 8, 61-64.
2. Grigoriev A.I., Bugakov A.I. (2015), The problem of health preservation in the conditions of a modern school, Izvestiya Voronezskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 1 (266), 69-73.
3. Gumerov R.A. (2015), To the question of the new content of the activity of a physical culture teacher, Modern studies of social problems (electronic scientific journal), No. 1, 159-166.
4. Korobchenko A.I. (2020), The problem of organizing students' activities on the independent formation of the motor regime, Science about man: humanitarian research, No. 1 (39). 100-106.
5. Kutin I. V., Andropova E.M., Shimansky O.V., Golushko T.V., Kolganova E.Yu. (2019), Formation of universal competence in physical culture lessons among students of a special medical group of a non-core university, Modern pedagogical education, No. 8, 57-59.
6. Naboychenko E.S., Mehovich G.I., Kunysheva S.D., Goncharova E.A. (2016) Improving the professional competence of a physical culture teacher in the process of forming communication skills, Actual problems of psychological knowledge, No. 3 (40), 117-123.
7. Educational standard of basic general education in physical culture: https://nsportal.ru/nachalnaya-shkola/fizkultura/2015/01/09/standart-osnovnogo-obshchego-obrazovaniya-po-fizicheskoy.
8. Strizhak A.P., Korolkov A.N., Denisova V.M. (2015), Factors of the effectiveness of sports-mass work in a physical education institution, Vestnik sportivnoi nauki, No. 6, 53-59.
9. Trushina E.V. (2018), Communicative culture as the most important component of the professional competence of a physical culture teacher in a modern university, Bulletin of the Tula State University. Physical education. Sport., No. 4, 125-130.
10. Fedorova T.Yu., Morozova L.P. (2017) Features of teaching the academic discipline "physical culture" at a technical university, World of Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 28.
11. Kuzmenko D., Kaipov S. (2018) Factors affecting students activity in the educational process on physical culture, Bulletin of North Kazakhstan State University named after Manash Kozybayev, No. 4 (41), 186-189.
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.
Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.
