SOCIAL HEALTH RISKS OF 18-YEAR-OLDS (BASED ON THE MATERIALS OF THE MONITORING "STUDY OF THE CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF A HEALTHY GENERATION 2013-2022" IN THE VOLOGDA REGION
Abstract
The relevance of studying a person's social health at the stage of adulthood is associated with the strengthening of his role in the process of socialization. However, empirical and theoretical studies that would solve the problem of disclosing the risks of the formation of social health of children and youth, its indicators and criteria have not been carried out enough. The importance of the topic is also confirmed by the unfavorable demographic situation in the country and the region. Having taken the first place in the world in terms of land area, Russia is rapidly losing its position in demo-graphic terms. In this regard, the problem of social health of young people is in the sphere of primary interests of the state. In order to build effective activities in this area, it is necessary to have objective information about the state of social health of young men and women, using official statistical sources and the results of scientific research. The paper uses the selective results of monitoring children's health "Study of conditions for the formation of a healthy generation" in the Vologda oblast. The sociological survey of boys and girls was conducted in the year when children born in 1995, 1998, 2001 and 2004 turned 18, respectively, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022. The sample size was 113 people, empirical data was collected by conducting an individual handout survey in the cities of Vologda, Cherepovets, and the territories of municipal districts. The purpose of the article: to identify individual risks of the formation of the social health of boys and girls of 18 years of age during the study period. The analysis of the responses in the framework of monitoring children's health revealed the risks of the formation of the social health of young people by the time of adulthood when entering adulthood.
Downloads
References
Андросов, А. С. Взаимопомощь как фактор эволюции // Юный ученый. 2016. № 6 (9). С. 60-6 URL: https://moluch.ru/young/archive/9/571/ (Дата обращения: 10.04.2023).
Борзиева, З. М. Ценностные ориентации современной молодежи // Молодой ученый. 2018. № 52 (238). С. 247-248. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/238/55006/ (Дата обращения: 01.04.2023).
Гафиатулина Н. Х. Социальное здоровье российской молодежи в условиях риска трансформирующегося общества // ИАЭК. 2012. №3 (31).
Гафиатулина Н. Х., Котлярова В. В. Социальное здоровье российской молодежи: макросоциологический анализ рисков // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки.2022. № 4. С. 281–286.
Глазырина И. А, Селиванова Ю. В. Проблема формирования целеустремленности и способы ее решения // Мир науки. Педагогика и психология.2021. №4.
Здоровье подростков и молодежи URL: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescentshealth-risks-and-solutions (Дата обращения: 18.05.2023).
Кадничанская М. И., Галкина Е. П. Труд как элемент ценностной системы молодежи // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2016. №2(37).URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/trud-kak-elementtsennostnoy-sistemy-molodezhi (Дата обращения: 05.04.2023).
Кропоткин П. А. Взаимопомощь как фактор эволюции. М.: Самообразование. 2011 256 с.
Матвеева Н.А. Формирование социального здоровья учащейся молодежи: практические рекомендации. Барнаул: Алт.ГПУ. 2018. 28 с.
Морев М. В. Социальное здоровье как категория социологии //Siberian Socium.2022.Том 6. № 2 (20). С. 68 DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2022-6-2-65-80
Мишина О. С. Методология исследования социального здоровья человека в местном сообществе // Теория и практика общественного развития.2011. №5.
Науэн М. С. Метод когортного анализа в социологии //ЖССА. 2006. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metod-kogortnogo-analiza-v-sotsiologii. (Дата обращения: 08.05.2023).
Социологический словарь/гл. ред. Д.М. Гвишиани. М.: Большая Российская Энциклопедия. 2002. 354 с
Социальное здоровье детей и молодежи: методология, теорияи, практика: монография / Л.А. Байкова; Ряз. гос. ун-т им. С.А. Есенина. Рязань. 2011. 224 с.
Субботина Р.А., Акопян А.Н., Баксанский О.Е Особенности копинг-поведения в юношеском возрасте на примере студентов медицинского Вуза//Коллекция гуманитарных исследований.2018. №4 (13).
Шавель С. А. Личностные качества и Человеческий капитал//Народонаселение – 2012.– №3 (57).
Goodfellow C, Hardoon D, Inchley J, Leyland AH, Qualter P, Simpson SA, Long E. Loneliness and personal well-being in young people: Moderating effects of individual, interpersonal, and community factors. J Adolesc. 2022 Jun;94(4):554-568. doi: 10.1002/jad.12046. Epub 2022 Apr 10. PMID: 35403218; PMCID: PMC9320932.
Goldman-Mellor S, Caspi A, Arseneault L, Ajala N, Ambler A, Danese A, Fisher H, Hucker A, Odgers C, Williams T, Wong C, Moffitt TE. Committed to work but vulnerable: self-perceptions and mental health in NEET 18-year olds from a contemporary British cohort. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;57(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12459. Epub 2015 Aug 26. PMID: 26791344; PMCID: PMC4789764. (Дата обращения: 08.05.2023).
Copyright (c) 2023 Health, physical culture and sports
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.
Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.