GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE IDEAS OF FAMILY ROLES AMONG STUDENTS

  • Konstantin Danilchuk Baikal State University Email: k808kk38@yandex.ru
Keywords: family, marriage, representations, family roles

Abstract

In modern society, there is a crisis of marriage and family, and there is a devaluation of these phenomena. In this regard, the problems of the family at this stage of the development of society are becoming more and more urgent, and psychological science, in turn, has a huge impact on strengthening the institution of the family. One of the important problems is the ideas of family and marriage among young people, as representatives of the generation who have yet to form family relations. The purpose of the research work was to study gender differences in students' ideas about family roles. 51 students participated in the study. The following methods were used as diagnostic tools to achieve the purpose of the study: the questionnaire "Distribution of roles in the family" by Yu. E. Alyoshina, L. Ya. Gozman, E. M. Dubovskaya, the questionnaire "Role expectations and claims in marriage" by A. N. Volkova and the questionnaire "Measuring attitudes in a married couple" by Yu. E. Alyoshina. For mathematical and statistical data processing, the following are used: the Mann-Whitney U-criterion. As a result, gender differences in perceptions of family roles were revealed. It was found that a woman in the family is assigned to perform most of the roles, especially on the part of young men, while the male sex is supposed to perform only the role of material support and career development. Moreover, girls do not have similar ideas and their claims are somewhat lower in performing many roles than boys expect. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Konstantin Danilchuk , Baikal State University

student

References

Авраменко Н. Н., Морозёнкова Е. В. Особенности представлений о семье и браке современной молодёжи / Н. Н. Авраменко, Е. В. Морозёнкова // Вестник калужского университета. Серия 1. Психологические науки. Педагогические науки. – 2020. – № 1 (6). – С. 11-25 Алешина Ю. Е., Борисов И. Ю. Полоролевая дифференциация как комплексный показатель межличностных отношений супругов / Ю. Е. Алешина, И. Ю. Борисов // Вестник МГУ. Серия 14. Психология. – 1989. – № 2. – С. 44-53 Бакланова О. Э. Согласованность супружеских ролей как фактор развития продуктивных брачно-семейных отношений: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. СПб., 2012. 25 с. Валгасова И. Н., Верещагина М. В. К проблеме изучения представлений о семье и семейных отношениях в отечественной психологии / И. Н. Валгасова, М. В. Верещагина // Образовательный вестник «Сознание» . – 2021. – Т. 23. – № 11. – С. 39-45 Зудилина И. Ю. Представления о согласованности ролей в семье как показатель готовности студентов к браку / И. Ю. Зудилина // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 3: Педагогика и психология. – 2018. – № 4 (228). – С. 118-122 Карабанова О. А. Психология семейных отношений и основы семейного консультирования / О. А. Карабанова. – М. : Гардарики, 2007. – 319 с. Лидерс А. Г.Семья как психологическая система : очерки психологии семьи / А. Г. Лидерс // Соц. науки. – Москва ; Обнинск , 2004. – 296 с. Сидоренко Е. В. Методы математической обработки в психологии / Е. В. Сидоренко // Речь. – СПб., 2000. – 349 с. Marks J., Chun Bun L., McHale S. M. Family Patterns of Gender Role Attitudes / Jaime Marks, Lam Chun Bun, Susan M. McHale // Sex Roles. – 2009. – 61(3-4). – р. 221–234. Moscovici S. The phenomenon of social representations / S. Moscovici // Social representations. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984 – P. 3-69 Csurgó B., Kristóf L. Gendered Norms and Family Roles in the Narratives of Hungarian Elite Members and Their Partners / Bernadett Csurgó, Luca Kristóf // Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis. – 2021. – Vol 11 (1). – pp. 1-23
Published
2023-12-19
How to Cite
Danilchuk K. GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE IDEAS OF FAMILY ROLES AMONG STUDENTS // Health, physical culture and sports, 2023. Vol. 32, № 4. P. 39-47. URL: http://hpcas.ru/article/view/14394.
Issue
Vol 32 No 4 (2023): Health, Physical Culture and Sports
Section
PEDAGOGICAL, SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS OF SPIRITUAL AND PHYSICAL CULTUR

Copyright (c) 2023 Health, physical culture and sports

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.

Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.

Bookmark and Share